Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02148
Original file (BC 2014 02148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02148

 			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of 
the United States, be corrected to reflect the following:

      a.  Block 1 – correct spelling of his first name. 
(Administratively Corrected)

      b.  Block 12, - “Race” reflect “Hispanic”.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Due to his heritage, his Spanish name was often converted to the 
English version.  There is also an error with the listing of his 
race.  

In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his 
DD Form 214 and Birth Certificate from the Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 18 Dec 
51.

On 15 Mar 56, the applicant was furnished an Honorable 
discharge, and was credited with 4 years of active service. 

The applicant’s DD Form 214, Item 12 – Race as “Caucasian”.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    





AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  

Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records 
System, does not provide guidance on changing the race in a 
veteran’s record.  A review of the applicant’s records revealed 
multiple source documents that listed the applicant’s race as 
“Caucasian”.  It appears the applicant served and was discharged 
under the race “Caucasian” nor does it appear to have been 
erroneously recorded.  This information has no bearing on any 
benefits or entitlements the applicant may apply for using this 
DD Form 214.  Since the applicant has no continuing affiliation 
with the Air Force as a Reserve member or retiree, we are unable 
to amend his military records after the fact.  

A review of the applicant’s personnel records revealed source 
documents that have the proper spelling of the applicant’s name.  
As these source documents validate the correct spelling, it 
appears an administrative error occurred when the DD Form 214 
was completed.  (Administratively Corrected) 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIRP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 Nov 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
that relief beyond that already granted administratively is not 
warranted.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested 
relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02148 in Executive Session on 28 Apr 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02148 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIRP, dated 15 Jul 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Nov 14.

						




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00721

    Original file (BC-2012-00721.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that IAW AFI 36- 3202, Separation Documents they cannot add the statement “Vietnam Era Veteran” to his DD Form 214; however, his Kuwait Liberation Medal has been amended to read Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) and will be administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his name in his military personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02216

    Original file (BC-2010-02216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 05017

    Original file (BC 2014 05017.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The personal information listed on the applicant’s DD Form 214 match all documents in her official military personnel record (Name, Social Security Number, Date of Birth, Home of Record at Time of Entry). Based on her signature throughout her military record, there is no evidence of her contesting her identity, personal information, or that the relative listed in Block 19b of her DD Form 214 not being valid. Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 16 Oct 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03193

    Original file (BC 2014 03193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends to grant relief to correct the applicant’s social security number, indicating there is evidence of an error or an injustice. A review of his personnel records revealed multiple source documents to validate his social security number is incorrect on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03449

    Original file (BC 2014 03449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03449 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect her maiden name. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01132

    Original file (BC 2014 01132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01132 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to change his name. However, any such name change should be limited only to the DD Form 214; any change to an applicant's other records to reflect a post-service name change should rarely be recommended, and only in the most unusual...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00242

    Original file (BC 2014 00242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2608, Military Personnel Record System, Tab A7.5, Correction of DOB, Note 3 reads “Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the date of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00610

    Original file (BC 2014 00610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Record and documentation provided failed to provide any substantive Foreign Service time in Korea. We took notice of the applicant’s complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01358

    Original file (BC-2006-01358.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01358 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 SEPTEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, block 7a, be changed to reflect "Mexican-American." ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00939

    Original file (BC 2014 00939.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00939 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect his name be changed. However, any such name change should be limited only to the DD Form 214; any change to an applicant's other records to reflect a post-service name change should rarely be recommended, and only in the...